I’m sorry, your credit’s no good.
“If bylines were money, I’d have paid off the mortgage by now” so the saying I just made up goes.
Last week somebody emailed me saying they’d seen a photo on my blog which they liked, and could they reproduce it in their magazine. Of course they couldn’t pay me, but I’d get a byline next to the photo.
While trying to hammer out this article I received an email from someone else, working for a large representative trade body, asking if they could use one of my photos in a report. Again, payment would be in the form of “Photo by Tim Gander.”
I’m going to hazard a guess that there are people out there who live in a world where they work hard, but for no money whatsoever. They don’t need to because in the night while they’re asleep, the food fairies come and stock the fridge; the pixies and the mice come and sew beautiful clothes and shoes for them, working until their teeny tiny fingers bleed, so that when the magazine editor and the corporate communications director come down to a breakfast of fairy-baked muffins and Fairtrade coffee, everything they need is there for them. And they can leave the house they built out of hugs and smiles, drive to the office in the car that runs on love and angel wings, to put in another day’s unpaid graft.
This must be the case, because they assume I can work for free too. Unfortunately (despite my excellently fairytale surname) I don’t own a goose that lays golden eggs. My house isn’t visited in the night by waistcoated mice with sewing needles and bolts of beautiful yarn.
Here’s the problem I have; I tried offering a brown envelope stuffed with bylined cuttings to my bank manager to pay off some of the mortgage, but apparently these are no longer considered legal tender in this country. They must have been once because the byline seems such a popular form of payment. Don’t get me wrong, bylines are nice but few people look at them, and they very rarely bring in new work. They do more for the photographer’s ego than his/ her bank balance.
A byline shouldn’t be seen as an alternative to payment. And the way web theft is going, I would go as far as to say that crediting the photographer in online use should become mandatory in all but the most tightly defined exceptions.
Personally, I love to help people whenever I can, but I can’t afford to give my work away for free. I don’t know anyone who can, and certainly not at the frequency with which these requests come to me. I’d also risk the wrath of fee-paying clients who have bought licences to my images.
I suppose I should be grateful that some people are still honest enough to ask, rather than just going ahead and stealing the photo and using it anyway. If you want a textbook example of wholesale copyright theft and its consequences, read up on the case of EPUK v LPA as it highlights the schism between what some people believe is perfectly acceptable netiquette, and what right-thinking people would view as theft. That story is still rumbling on, so I’ll leave it there as a festering reminder of what happens when people nick stuff off the web.
In the meantime, I’ll be happy that people ask me if they can use my work, so long as they’re not offended when I say yes, but not for free. Last time I checked, Tesco don’t accept my bylines either.
Amen to that brother, amen to that.
Let’s all kneel and pray for the byline sinners…
Isn’t it the way. Those who ask you to work for a credit are inevitably on a good whack themselves.
When was the last time Sainsbury’s accepted a byline for food. I offered to openly use a Sainsbury’s carrier bag so that they would get full credit for my supper and everything…
I’m surprised at Sainsbury’s attitude though, because surely other people will pay for their food and your little bag of goods won’t make the slightest difference to them. Of course they’ll charge you for the bag under the disguise of being green.
Maybe we could start pushing back the front line by blocking out the brand names on our camera gear, cars, mobiles etc.
My favorites are the Bright Young Things who ask to use my images in the TV doc they are researching (Tiger Aspect is one name that comes to mind) and offering a fantastic ‘free byline’ in the credits, but unfortunately they have no budget to pay for photos.
My stock response is that I have a simple but elegant solution for them.
1)The person who set the budget, but failed to include any money for images, is clearly incompetent.
2) So, fire them.
3) Then, use the money saved on their salary to pay for images.
Everyone’s a winner!
Brilliant! Let’s face it, most people who set budgets seem to be incompetent because they never bother to find out what stuff costs before working out what the budget should be.
What amazes me is that the photography budget is always set at £0.00. Also, does everything have its own budget? Do they have a budget for pencils? One for phone calls to gullible amateurs? Surely it would be simpler and cheaper (as per your suggestion) to fire whoever sets these budgets-within-budgets and save even more money by having just one budget. Let’s call it the “Getting The Job Done Professionally” budget and have done.
I feel a whole new movement starting tonight. Light the torches! Call the Witchsmeller Pursuivant! We’m gonna have us a burnin’ tonight!
Ahem, apologies. Medication is on the way.
grab the pitch fork and the flaming torches we are off up to the castle lads (and ladies of course)
Another great post – These people are a joke.
Thanks Keith, yes, but not a very funny one.